Supreme Court

Supreme Court affirms Presidential emergency powers, limits suspension of elected officials

In a 6-1 ruling, the Supreme Court has affirmed the President’s constitutional authority to declare a state of emergency to prevent a collapse of law and order.

However, the court stipulated that the suspension of elected state officials under such a declaration must be for a limited time.

The majority judgment, delivered by Justice Mohammed Idris, found that Section 305 of the Constitution grants the President broad discretion to deploy “extraordinary measures” to restore normalcy during an emergency.

The court noted the provision does not specify these measures, leaving their nature to presidential discretion.

The case was brought by Adamawa State and ten other PDP-led states. They challenged the state of emergency declared by President Bola Tinubu in Rivers State, which included the six-month suspension of Governor Siminalayi Fubara and other elected officials.

Justice Idris first upheld objections from the defendants—the Attorney General of the Federation and the National Assembly—stating the plaintiffs failed to establish a cause of action that fell under the Supreme Court’s original jurisdiction.

He struck out the suit on jurisdictional grounds but proceeded to also dismiss it on its merits.

In a dissenting opinion, Justice Obande Ogbuinya agreed the President could declare an emergency but argued this power could not be used to suspend elected officials like governors, deputies, or lawmakers.

About The Author