Senate
Senate Passes Electoral Act Amendment After Heated Plenary Session
Lawmakers Clash Over Electronic Transmission Clause Before 55-15 Vote
The Senate on Tuesday passed the Electoral Act, 2022 (Repeal and Re-Enactment) Bill 2026 following a turbulent session that saw lawmakers locked in fierce disagreement.
The controversy erupted when Senator Enyinnaya Abaribe (ADC, Abia South) raised a point of order challenging Clause 60, leading to sharp divisions in the upper chamber.
Senate President Godswill Akpabio initially asserted that the matter had been previously withdrawn, but opposition senators immediately contested this claim.
Citing Order 52(6), Deputy Senate President Barau Jibrin argued against revisiting provisions already ruled upon—a submission that triggered further uproar and a brief confrontation between Senator Sunday Karimi and Senator Abaribe.
Senate Leader Opeyemi Bamidele intervened, reminding lawmakers that his motion for rescission rendered previous decisions invalid, thereby supporting Abaribe’s demand.
Akpabio suggested Abaribe’s call for division was merely for public demonstration, but sustained the point of order, prompting the Abia lawmaker to formally move his motion.
Invoking Order 72(1), Senator Abaribe demanded division on Clause 60(3), seeking removal of a proviso allowing manual result transmission when electronic transmission fails, arguing that Form EC8A should not stand alone in such circumstances.
During the division, Akpabio directed supporters of the proviso to stand, followed by opponents—15 opposition senators—resulting in a 55-15 vote against Abaribe’s position.
The session had earlier stalled during clause-by-clause consideration following a motion to rescind previous amendments, which was formally seconded Tuesday, enabling the committee of the whole to undertake detailed reconsideration.
Before rescission, the Senate cited concerns over the 2027 election timetable and technical inconsistencies in the legislation.
Bamidele moved for rescission under Order 52(6), explaining that INEC’s February 2027 election timetable conflicted with Clause 28’s requirement that elections be scheduled not later than 360 days before tenure expiration.
He warned that the 360-day notice requirement would place the 2027 presidential and National Assembly elections during Ramadan, potentially affecting voter turnout and electoral credibility.
The motion also identified discrepancies in the bill’s Long Title and multiple clauses, including Clauses 6, 9, 10, 22, 23, 28, 29, 32, 42, 47, 51, 60, 62, 64, 65, 73, 77, 86, 87, 89, 93, and 143, affecting cross-referencing and internal consistency.
